Get e-book Des états dâmes: ...à la liberté... (MON PETIT EDITE) (French Edition)

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Des états dâmes: ...à la liberté... (MON PETIT EDITE) (French Edition) file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Des états dâmes: ...à la liberté... (MON PETIT EDITE) (French Edition) book. Happy reading Des états dâmes: ...à la liberté... (MON PETIT EDITE) (French Edition) Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Des états dâmes: ...à la liberté... (MON PETIT EDITE) (French Edition) at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Des états dâmes: ...à la liberté... (MON PETIT EDITE) (French Edition) Pocket Guide.
555 commentaires
Contents:


  1. Territoires
  2. Heather Belnap Jensen on The Journal des Dames et des Modes
  3. Subscribe to this APAR
  4. Georgetown University

The appointment of six members, to represent Canada in the British Senate; three for the district of Quebec, and three for the district of Montreal. Do not precipitate your judgement, until I had time to present you this new plan, with all its features, and in its entirety. I am not unaware that opulence, distributed by luck of a miserly hand, even in the first classes of our citizens of Canada, would not put at our disposal subjects who would be able to represent, with glare and external dignity, a province such as ours, in the British Senate.

It would consequently be necessary to elevate their impotence with funds taken from their constituents, and to compensate the expenses of their pump and external decoration by stakes levied on all the classes of citizens. Thus our nobility would shine at the expense of the commoners, i. These are not the unpopular views which motivated me in preparing the all popular plan that I here submit to your deliberations. No; but while waiting for the revolution of times prepared and brought forward by the administrative wisdom of England, that Canada sees, in its midst, running with more abundance, the torrent of richnesses, and growing, by the increase in the circulation of gold, the fortunes of his children, it is in England, our national metropolis, that we would go to seek six gentlemen of fortune, and patriotic virtue, who could and would want to make us the honour to represent us in Parliament, i.

This defence preparation, in our favour, would by itself be enough to choke in principle the occasion and the need for it. A governor, who would know that, in London, we can count on representatives in the senate to defend our rights, would hardly be tempted to attack them, i. In the remainder, the elections in England cost nothing to the interested parties; over there, the famous bill of Mr. Grenville decided, for eternity, on the generosity, the disinterestedness, the nobility of sentiment, in one word the virtue, of the voters and the candidates.

These last ones would redden not to owe their election exclusively to themselves and their own merit; therefore, they are wary no to corrupt and buy the votes out, which being always free are delivered for nothing: candidates having, of constitution, nothing to offer, the voters, also animated by such a noble spirit, have, neither in inclination nor in fact, nothing to accept; and of members who sit in the name of the various electoral divisions of England, not one senator who has spent a penny for his senatorial place.

What a wonder of honesty! The name of Mr. Grenville, author of such a famous and so general and virtuous revolution of the hearts, deserves to be inscribed with a distinction and a special glory, in the record of the apostles, the most famous converter of the universe. At all events, if twelve hundred leagues away from England Mr. Greenville's famous bill on the incorruptibility of elections, were to, on such a long road, lose a little of its energy, thousands of these so miserly candidates in England, in the days of their elections, would be furiously tempted to open, with full declads, their well furnished purses for you, to buy at all costs the honour of your votes; but born in the middle of wind gusts and storms, English virtue can support itself on the crossing of the seas.

At least your elections would cost you nothing but a little time, wasted initially perhaps, but which would soon pay off with usury; because these happy candidates, honoured by your choice, and once elected turned into your representatives, would be strengthened by recognition and honour as so many public guards and friends, who, enlightened by your instructions, would find personal and national glory in espousing haut la main your interests, and in eloquently pleading your cause by the throne and the senate.

In the shade of such a respectable protection, you would become respectable and frightening even for your governors, who would then hardly have the ideas turned towards oppression, when they would know that, to oppress you successfully and with impunity, they would have all the might of parliamentary authority to vanquish and overcome: you would be then too strong to fall victim of their weakness. Moreover, these governors, according to the national genius, would perhaps be open to the suggestion of ambition, avid of this active representation in the senate; you would have, under the hand of your recognition, civil honors to pay the benefits which a soft and beneficial administration could grant you: here are charms sufficient enough to convert into an easy generous and benign governor, the despot, by natural inclination, the haughtier and most superb one, and even to make of a General Haldimand another Chevalier de Savile, alas!

In the remainder, Messieurs , may the modesty of your sentiments not impose itself on the timidity your claims; perhaps a sad experiment had taught England that the wisest policy, to bind itself to the remote colonists, dictates their incorporatation in the assembly which represents the whole body of the nation, to simplify the empire, and to put it, by this incorporation in a unity of government, which is the mother of solidity and consistency.

At least your entry in the senate if it were ever a question of it would not degrade 4 the very majesty of the senate itself: Frenchmen have in the past illustrated, by their presence, the majesty of this august assembly: Calais, the small town of Calais, once appointed two members of Parliament, and these foreigners, if however subjects, subjects indeed, can be foreigners in the States of their legitimate sovereign these foreigners, say I, admitted, by introducing their virtues there, did but add gloss and glare to this famous body: History, written by a cosmopolitan mind, still speaks with praise of their services.

You should note here, Messieurs , that the royal introducer, who believed it his duty, in justice for his French subjects on the continent, to introduce them in the British senate, was a despot, Henri VIII who, on his deathbed, prided himself with having never spared, during his reign, neither a man in his anger, nor a woman in his debauchery. What shouldn't we hope for from a sovereign who today makes the procession of all virtues reign on the throne of England? The most singular thing about this parliamentary admission of the French, is that under Edward VI, the reign of the Reform was established in England: the Calesians did not adopt it; yet their members were not expelled from their senatorial seats for that: thus one did not believe that there was a constitutional incompatibility between parliamentary dignity and non-reformation.

How many reflexions to be made here! But me, I am Protestant; we must leave something to say, and especially to do for our Roman Catholics in Canada. But in case you were not favourable to the combining of your representation in Parliament to the institution of an assembly, two quite miscible establishments however, and quite necessary to your happiness it would then be necessary to go back to the principles that we already defined; because, when it is the hand of reflexion a happy reflexion that chose them, their force and their solidity are set to subsist; these six members of Parliament would form but one body, twelve hundred leagues away from you; oppression could quietly devise to strike you with unexpected blows; and oppression, in exertion and in office, is always too long; the body which you qualify today a little too liberally perhaps of the sublime name of "Legislative Body", could become the "Body of your Mediators", by doubling their number up to Their multiplication would bristle up the difficulty of their total corruption: but a just and wise economy should rule the terms of this increase.

Their fee is [presently] set at pounds sterling; reduce it in half, it would be enough, if it were honour and virtue that were to lead these legislators; and it would be too much, if a noble motive entered in the administration of their dignity. In the remainder, the safety of the province would enjoy a more inviolable shelter, if we invested the Canadiens of the right to elect annually at least half of the 46 members of the legislative body, which, under this elective face, would offer, in spite of its mixity, at least a sample of the representation of the whole country: in this way its deliberations, brought at the feet of the throne, would announce the feelings of all of Canada, while, in the current shape of our provincial government, the ministry of England is deprived of any fixed point, of any similar pledge, to be assured of it; as such does we see him wander, on such an important article, alas, too much!

Lastly, these annual elections would fix the elected legislators in the sphere of duty and fidelity toward their constituents, to whom they would depend upon for their renomination. The same yearly recurrence of election should mark the choice of the six members of Parliament, which should take place in September, to arrive in time for the usual opening of the Parliament in November. It would be to this senate to rule on the nature of the oath to administer to these senators of new creation.

I have discussed at large these parts of the reform, which alone can give stability to a government made for your happiness; the other isolated and detached points require less comments; I am only making them ostensible by assigning them in paragraphs. To decorate the concession of the Roman catholic religion in Canada of all its pump, the parade of the sanction by the legislature, and after that to toss aside, in the province, the priests, who are the ministers made to perpetuate it, is to highly grant the benefit with one hand, and to take it away dully with the other; it is a kinds of a duplicity, unworthy of a nation which frankness and uprightness have, from time immemorial, characterized and marked the traits.

By the way, what a narrow and particularly faulty system, that of going each year in Savoy to beg and buy up a couple of priests there, to lend them to Canada? And it is our ministers who undertook to conclude this admirable bargain! Eh, but! But State leaders! Are they made to be parish administrators? One would soon lower them to make churchwardens out of them; greater responsibilities call them elsewhere; what narrow mindedness, but the more out of place here, that it seems that by doing this the government of England was startled and took offence of a handful of priests, who isolated all by themselves, and dispersed in the parishes of Canada, helpless, without external supports, can have no influence on politics, and are fortunately reduced out of necessity to the role which the holiness of their state prescribes them; we are no longer in those disastrous days, when the tiaras and the mitres were the only crowns of the universe; it is to revive, in a way, the shame of these unhappy times, to suppose?

Canada, by the kind of education which it provides to its youth, generally destined to the needs of agriculture, enrols but few subjects to the service of the Church. Ah well! In the remainder, this free entry in Canada granted to Roman priests, is the general system adopted today in all the American colonies; this power, still in the cradle of its sovereignty, has thus far deployed a smoothness of administrative policy: one can shamelessly copy it as a model.

Moreover, here is a point which should not escape the public. A great part of the Indian nations is attached to the Roman communion: this attachment binds them in trade, preferably to their fellow-members of religion. In the piteous situation, in mercantile matter, where Canada sits today, it would be well out of place to deprive it from this help, by taking away its ability to dispatch its priests, for the service of the Savage Churches. America would benefit from avoiding to neglect this. The wages of these advisers, before the conquest, did not exceed little ecus, currency of France.

Considering the circulation of cash, which by enriching the province increased the price of food products, the generosity of the English government could increase the wages of the these advisers up to pounds sterling. The salaries of the judges today can go up to pounds and several of them who have nominally up to four or five seats for themselves. Where is the economy for the State? England is getting out of a ruinous war, in which the mass of her national debts increased to a monstrous magnitude.

It would be to ask that she let herself and her peoples crumble down, to solicitate expensive and costly institutions: Canada already costs her too much; but I then assure on my honour here that it is not the fault of Canada itself; if ever a body of assembly were to chair its administration and to review public expenditure, soon the colony, discharged from insane expenses, would be self-sufficient to govern itself with its established incomes, and ever to flower.

Territoires

I can only add here: let us continue. Under the French government, these spices were reduced to the sphere of the greatest moderateness; because of that did Canada hardly ever saw in its midst this voracious race, which lives off the manure of all the madnesses of humankind: hardly three or four causes were being judged in the course of one year in the Superior Council of Quebec. At least it would not cost much for the return of this golden age.

Here it is only to England that I have the honour to speak. The United States of America already gathers preparations for the building of a city, at a distance of only a few miles away from Montreal. In the event of war, if the colony is not permanently equipped with an army to face the enemy, as soon as he enters, we will consequently see it descending firmly all the way at the doors of the capital, i.

It is only the Canadien providence, which can save it from this final destiny, imparable in any other case; but if the inhabitants are taken by surprise on the first step of the irruption, doesn't their reaction decide the fall of the capital? I stop here for an explanation; patriotism orders me to it. I will say enough to make the need of stopping the invasion clear right away. To delegate to the national troops of England this first office of resistance, would require a large army in Canada, whose value, in product, would not correspond to the value of maintenance.

It is thus to the Canadiens to be their own defenders, and their principal guards: but it is necessary to initiate them, discipline them in military science, and to support them with leaders, on the traces of whom, they can go with confidence and courage to the defence of their fatherland. A regiment of two battalions, gradually spread out in all the extent of the colony, would form in its various quarterings, by the emulation and example, the militia of the respective parishes: Canada, on this regard, would soon become all-military and soldatesque.

It would then be up to it, and the bravery of its children, to defend itself; at least can I assure in advance, that if it were to fall, it would fall only with honour. This regiment should be commanded, I hear in the subordinates places only by Canadien officers: first, it would become an open entry to so many brave Canadien men, whose services and exploits still remain today without any reward from the nation's public gratitude, which generosity has always distinguished in all times.

I will let her be judge of the following story. It is the most brilliant action to have illustrated the arms of the king in these regions; but it cost a great deal to one of our brave Canadien gentlemen, Mr. These losses were modestly exposed to the justice of the government, but the treasury office answered that such was the fortune of war, which had spread identical devastations, in the English Islands of America, and that it would be of equal justice, i. The case is neither similar in the circumstances, nor analogous in its continuations.

At the invasion of the colony, an American proclamation had guaranteed their possessions to the Canadiens , who lived quietly in their domestic properties without initially entering the national quarrel; they were enjoying their heritage in peace; it was a royal proclamation which, in the name of the Master's munificence, tear them off of their neutrality.

Is it to the glory of the sovereign that subjects be deceived and fall victims of the words he spoke through the body of his representative? We would then have no respect for them nor desire to obey them: to answer by the affirmative would not be good policy for who cares about the salute of a State. The consequences would be terrible here; at the first irruption, the Canadiens would thus be forced to bury themselves in the inaction of neutrality.

Would they face the devastations of a war in favour of a State which would have declared them in advance, that there is little reparation and compensation to expect from him? I request the Treasury to excuse me for this little discussion: if I loved England and the conservation of her colony less, I would have stayed silent on a matter in which nothing can interest me but my patriotism, and my fidelity to my sovereign; because it is not my own cause which I plead here: the military career was indeed that of my ancestors: special circumstances and personal tastes decided of my person elsewhere; but the safety of the colony, and our national existence depend on the exertion of these soldiers: I would groan for England even more than for me if the exertion of these brave men came to be necessarily irritated by public ingratitude.

Otherwise, the regiment would not be made up of Canadien soldiers; they would all refuse to enrol themselves in it; and even their voluntary admission would not be acceptable to them for the progress of the colony because it needs the hands of her children for the daily work of farming. This regiment would thus consist only of foreigners, to whom, for the general good, the entry of the province should be made freely under the terms of a parliamentary proclamation.

Durand, le patron d'Alain. Himself - segment "Images de Boris Vian". Himself - segment "Yves Robert sur le tournage du Retour du grand blond". Official Sites: France's national library catalogue. Edit Did You Know? Star Sign: Cancer. Edit page.

Heather Belnap Jensen on The Journal des Dames et des Modes

Clear your history. IMDb Everywhere. Follow IMDb on. DPReview Digital Photography. Audible Download Audio Books. La plupart des gens sont incapables de s'adapter. Pour tuer un boa, il faut simplement attendre qu'il soit repu et assoupi. Si on n'a pas compris ce qu'entreprend FH alors Ca donnerait le tournis!

Peut-on garder encore l'espoir dans de telles circonstances? Je n'ai pas eu le temps ,sourie,de vous saluer. Ces photos sont terribles et connues de tous les pieds-noirs. Trop de repentance tue la repentance. Est-ce la bonne ou la mauvaise nouvelle du jour?

Avez-vous des preuves tangibles? A 17 ans,je passais des armes pour le Fln". Avec mes compliments. C'est un effet naturel. Nul besoin de passer des heures sur internet. C'est vrai, c'est un peu plus long que d'aller dans ses liens favoris qui renvoient aux sites Dreuz ou fdesouches. Et oui! Moi, je veux bien. Quelle tristesse. Il y a des franco-suisses, etc etc. On pourrait alors compter ceux qui font le choix de la France Il n'y avait rien. Il ne la souhaitait pas il me semble. Je ne pense pas qu'il la souhaitait lui aussi. Mode ironique. Cela arrangeait ses petites affaires. Un jour il se prendra les pieds dans le tapis.

Ce sont ces images, connues de tous les Pieds Noirs qui expliquent l'exode de , car les Pieds Noirs savaient ce qui les attendait. Pourrait on voir de telles images dans le futur en France? Je viens d'en lire une nouvelle biographie par Max Gallo. Vous aviez raison d'avance, c'est triste. Et, Hollande veut encore demander pardon! Si vous voulez savoir ce qu'est une foule qui acclame regardez les films sur les discours d'Hitler d'avant-guerre. C'est autre chose. On dirait que vous ne les avez jamais vus.

Certes en juin en pouvait titrer Comment pouvait-on croire le contraire? La question comprend deux aspects. Et toujours de nous ramener la colonisation! Soyez bon A chacun sa marotte. Par les musulmans. Silence radio dans la rue musulmane. A vomir et maintenant on doit faire repentance pour la colonisation a dit ramadan ce soir!

D'ailleurs, ceux qui sont morts, comme Hernu, sont hors d'atteinte de la justice. Moi, je le suis beaucoup moins.


  • Redressing the Virago in Christine de Pizan’s Livre de la cité des dames.
  • Dames Mode & Kleding.
  • Sociology and the Stereotype of the Criminal: Volume 94 (International Behavioural and Social Sciences, Classics from the Tavistock Press);
  • Premier site de petites annonces automobiles - Comores?
  • (PDF) DENIS DIDEROT RAMEAU’S NEPHEW "Le Neveu Rameau" | Richard de Koster - eqocehotec.tk.
  • Gods Covenants: Learning About God and His Word;
  • Filmography.

Peace and Love. On en redemande.

Subscribe to this APAR

Il suffit de voir qui agresse qui dans les faits divers. Il suffit de voir qui emmerde dans les cantines avec le halal, les interdits. Quant aux kebabs…! Et ceux qui s'y collent le font avec parcimonie et modestie. Ce n'est pas bien de lire en diagonale. Ce n'etait et ce n'est pas un espace ou tout peut etre reecrit, ou rien ne peut etre superpose, c'est ainsi, que vous le vouliez ou non! De plus, jamais je n'accepterais vos us et coutumes barbares, la plus ignomineuse etant pour moi l'abattage rituel des animaux de boucherie casher inclus , votre haine des chiens etc Je ne veux pas que le martyr de ces animaux ait lieu sur le sol de mon pays, je m'opposerai egalement a ce que ce genre de viande soit importee en France, car l'accepter serait un compromis malhonnete.

Retournez dans le pays de vos aieux, comme les pieds-noirs l'ont fait, et les recriminations cesseront. Vous avez le vent en poupe a present, mais pour encore combien de temps? Prenons un exemple. Que tout le monde voit ces photos, elles expliquent beaucoup de choses.

Vous voulez croire en l'Islam c'est votre droit le plus strict. Vous n'avez pas, et je ne vous donne pas, le droit de me l'imposer.

Mais je peux, il est vrai, me tromper. Un parfait parasite. Il ne faut pas se voiler la face,il ne faut pas oublier. Il y a des choses qu'on ne peut ni oublier,ni pardonner. Boudarel, Minne, et tant d'autres Quel rapport? Douteux,le cas de Hernu? Et il FAUT savoir. Cette histoire me rend malade. Car ce ne sont pas les historiens, ni les journalistes qui en feront des tartines dessus. Je ne tire pas, comme vous, mes informations d'internet, parce que j'en ai d'autres bien plus fiables.

Je sors, je questionne les gens, je ne vis pas comme vous dans un cocon rose bonbon. Parce que c'est bien l'impression que j'ai quand je vous lis.

Georgetown University

C'est ainsi que j'ai fini par aller voir ce que disait une certaine Bat Ye'or, je n'ai retenu de ce qu'elle disait qu'un salmigondis. Marlan plus fort que les rav ,pour interpreter les textes! Essayons de les oublier. Tandis qu'en France, c'est franchement le bordel C'est pourquoi il fait bon vivre en Suisse Non, je ne peux pas le croire. Les politiciens changent mais n'y changent rien. Pour les "souchiens", les carottes seront cuites. Cette perspective de croissance du nombre de musulmans est fort probable. Je vois mal le rapport avec les catholiques?

Ce sont eux qui-un jour- se feront respecter. Non seulement la France mais l'Europe sera musulmane. Il suffit de saisir "exmusulman" sur internet pour comprendre le danger. Le nombre d intervenants sur ce blog des que l on parle de l islam temoigne de l acuite de ce probleme et du desarroi d une majorite de francais qui se sentent en desaccord avec leurs dirigeants. A l inverse la majorite des musulmans trouvent normal de vivre, voire d imposer leur culture au pays qui les accueille et qui leur a accorde la nationalte.

Ils oublient que c est une faveur qui leur est accordee, imposant des droits mais aussi des devoirs. Ils font etat de leur nationalite mais ne renoncent pas a leur identite qui restera eternellement etrangere a celle du pays d accueil; Alors que les immigrands des pays europeens se sont integres dans la culture francaise, une grande partie des immigrants musulmans, non seulement refusent l assimilation mais pretendent imposer leur culture. Alors aue lesdirigeants musulmans connaissent parfaitement la culture europeene les occidentaux connaissent tres mal la doctrine de l islam.

Cette meconnaissance souvent au plus haut niveau de l Etat explique les confusions et les erreurs de ces dirigeants et le desarroi de citoyens. Avec juste raison, Ivan Rioufol parle du cinquieme pouvoir que vous representez en vous exprimant librement sur ce blog et sur internet en general. Il ne faut jamais desesperer et s avouer vaincu avant d avoir livrer bataille. Le seul enseignement que voudrais vous apporter depuis Israel ou j habite depuis 24 ans, ce petit pays qui ose affirmer son identite et ses valeurs alors qu il est entoure de 25 pays ennemis est le suivant: L islam est une foi, une loi et un droit.

Il ne faut surtout pas s opposer a la foi des musulmans, il faut la respecter comme toutes les autres fois. Par contre concernant la loi la sharia, elle s applique certes aux musulmans mais elle pretend aussi s appliquer aux Chretiens et aux Juifs et c est la que le bat blesse. Mon conseil est d apprendre a connaitre l islam avec des islamologues non musulmans, ne pas tomber dans le piege du blaspheme mais lutter avec la plus grande energie contre doctrine religieuse qui voudrait s imposer a la Rapublique Francaise L Occident toutes les forces pour repousser victorieusement le defi que lui lance l islam fondamentaliste.

L Islam raconte a l occident Editions Persse Vous ne savez pas ce que vous dites, on vous pardonne. Ou nos dirigeants sont des incapables ou ils sont des vendus. Nous sommes dans un pays libre, les musulmans, les juifs ont le droit de croire. Pour la basilique : c'est la maison de Dieu. La protection des faibles est un devoir absolu des chevaliers de Dieu. En fait ils ne font que suivre ce que le Coran dit. Il faut foutre tous ces gens dans des vols charters et les renvoyer en France. Il ne faut pas chercher bien loin les responsables de l'islamisation de la France: Les 17 ans de pouvoir des Chirac et Sarkosy.

Trop de blabla Lulu, quand on a mal aux dents, on va chez le dentiste, pas chez un occuliste ou un pneumologue, OK? Jamais on ne leur pardonnera cette alliance. Ce n'est pas pour rien que commentaires suivent son intervention. Pourquoi pas ajouter "thoraphobie" et cathophobie, surtout au regard des prises de position sur des sujets politiques dans l'espace public! Tiens encore une notion fourre-tout dans l'arsenal juridique. Quand je trie mes pommes de terre, je fais de la discrimination. Il ne fait pour moi aucun doute qu'il a fait l'objet de pressions, si ce n'est de menaces.

En outre, beaucoup de migrants ne sont pas musulmans. Ce qui se passe en France est un scandale. En revanche, la religion musulmane est en expansion exponentielle, c'est aussi vrai. Je pense qu'il a raison. Quel en est l'objectif? C'est faux. Comment les faire rester? L'Eglise, complice, ne s'est pas battue. Pasqua reconnait l'Islam comme religion d'Etat. La politique qui s'empare le plus de cela est la politique de gauche.

La raison est simple, elle favorise cette immigration afin de recueillir un jour le vote de ces personnes. Les medias en France sont acquis a la cause de cette gauche laxiste et destructrice. La solution se passera dans la douleur. Pour pouvoir faire du social il faut en avoir les moyens.

La France ne peut plus se permettre ce luxe. Il y en a ras le bol de cette attitude du politiquement correct. Essayez de faire cela en Arabie Saoudite La religion n'est elle pas l'opium du peuple? Cessons de fumer. Vous vous appuyez sur des caricatures de l'islam et des musulmans. Ce ne sont pas de vrais musulmans. Au lieu de fantasmer une pseudo invasion musulmane, demandez vous comment vous pouvez aider votre patrie. Bravo Omar. Disons que vous faites fort. Ceux ci sont bien des produits de vos terroirs.

L'islam c'est pour la France ce que le cancer est pour l'intestin. Eliminons les tumeurs tant qu'elles ne sont pas trop nombreuses, sinon, un jour il faudra la grosse intervention chirurgicale comme le 6 juin Ce jour n'en doutez pas, il est ineluctable Le patriotisme ne s'installera jamais chez eux, ils n'en veulent pas de notre patriotisme, ils ne veulent que le patriotisme des allocations et de la charia. Descartes, Pascal, Ampere, Voltaire, Moliere, Pasteur, les Freres Lumiere, Hugo, Berlioz, Piaf et bien d'autres geants du savoir international qui ont fait connaitre la France auront-ils le status du dhimmis du passe.

Maintenant ils tournent leur veste,parceque c est Hollande qui a pris le pouvoir La France n est plus la France!!!

Notre Album SOLO

Mais comme on a de moins en moins de fric et de plus en plus d'envahisseurs Comme quoi!! C est pour faire joli?? Le pays est plus corrompu que jamais:je prend la justice par exemple:y a pas un avocat, un magistrat, un procureur, un huissier, un policier qui ne mange pas de bakhchich Je ne sais pas aller leurs demander Quelle antinomie!!! Cela n'existe pas. Resterons-nous longtemps laxistes? Bonsoir carl. Economiquement la france a tout a perdre de son islamisation car une majorite de ces dites personnes ne travaille pas et profite du systeme que toi ' petit' francais tu t acharne a faire foncionner Donc mathematiquement s ils n ont plus rien a gratter ils iront vour ailleur.

Moi je suis pret a combattre pour defendre mon pays j ai 23 ans et deux beaux enfants de 3 ans et 18 mois je fais ce que je peux pour repeupler!. Il faudra aussi combatre sans pitie ni scrupules les francais et francaises qui les defendent. Mais le risque des groupes minoritaires et radicaux souhaitant que la France devienne un pays islamique est grande, et dangereuse.

L'islam n'est pas une religion. Pas d'autre solution puisque 'il ne peut pas y avoir de dialogues avec des fous meurtriers. Et que de haine dans vos messages A quand nos guerres de religions? Nos messages de terreur, notre inquisition? Aux yeux de l'Histoire, pas si loin Aujourd'hui, en janvier , il y a en France au moins 5 millions de musulmans.

Comment pensez vous? Je ne fais que suivre votre raisonnement.